Inappropriate Use of the Fourth Geneva Convention

..."Occupied Territory"

The term occupied territory,which appears in the Fourth Geneva Convention, originated as a result of the Nazi occupation of Europe. Though it has become common parlance to describe the West Bank and Gaza as occupied territories, there is no legal basis for using this term in connection to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Professor Julius Stone, a leading authority on the Law of Nations, categorically rejected the use of the term occupied territoryto describe the territories controlled by Israel on the following counts:

(1) Article 49 relates to the invasion of sovereign states and is inapplicable because the West Bank did not and does not belong to any other state.

(2) The drafting history of Article 49 [Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War] that is, preventing genocidal objectivesmust be taken into account. Those conditions do not exist in Israel's case.

(3) Settlement of Jews in the West Bank is voluntary and does not displace local inhabitants. Moreover, Stone asserted: that no serious dilution (much less extinction) of native populations[exits]; rather a dramatic improvement in the economic situation of the [local Palestinian] inhabitants since 1967 [has occurred].”...

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.